[pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

Michael Stapelberg stapelberg at debian.org
Wed Sep 16 17:52:29 UTC 2015


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Dmitry Smirnov <onlyjob at debian.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2015 01:53:33 Potter, Tim wrote:
>> Trying to rebuild it just now and there’s a missing package
>> github-robfig-go-cache, a fork of github-pmylund-go-cache which is,
>> according to github, 35 commits behind and 1 commit on top.
>>
>> The commit in question is here:
>>
>> https://github.com/robfig/go-cache/commit/9fc39e0dbf62c034ec4e45e6120fc6943
>> 3a3ec51
>
>> and unfortunately it’s not compatible with the direction that
>> pmylund-go-cache has taken.  )-:
>
>> I guess this means robfig-go-cache need to be packaged alongside
>> pmylund-gocache unless someone wants to port revel to use it.
>
> I've already opened a bug with upstream:
>
>     https://github.com/revel/revel/issues/983
>
> IMHO neither we nor they (revel) should be using unmaintained forks where it
> is impossible even to report bugs...

Note that disabling issues is GitHub’s default behavior when one forks
a repository. That of course neither helps you nor does it excuse the
fact, but it might give you a little bit more understanding as to why
one frequently stumbles over repositories with issues disabled.

>
> --
> All the best,
>  Dmitry Smirnov.
>
> ---
>
> Perhaps most ridiculous of all is the suggestion that we 'keep' our
> radioactive garbage for the use of our descendants. This 'solution', I
> think, requires an immediate poll of the next 20,000 generations.
>         -- David R. Brower
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
> Pkg-go-maintainers at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers



-- 
Best regards,
Michael



More information about the Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list