[pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF
Michael Stapelberg
stapelberg at debian.org
Tue Jan 23 21:48:04 UTC 2018
Status update: I now have tooling to perform the “delete existing upstream
branch, create a tracking upstream branch in correct version from Go import
path” step. The tooling still fails on about 60 of 901 repositories. I’ll
take a look at the failures and give another status update.
The VCS composition is:
889 git
3 hg
2 bzr
I’ll need to look into how to use git-remote-{hg,bzr}.
Also, I’m wondering how we can accomplish automated git remote
configuration, i.e. how do people obtain an upstream branch which tracks
the correct upstream remote branch? AFAICT, git-buildpackage has no
solution for this (yet?). Does anyone know by chance?
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg at debian.org>
wrote:
> Status update: I discovered (and documented) gbp’s postclone=origtargz
> option. Also, I prepared (and documented/referenced) two git hooks.
>
> I’m still not entirely certain about how to approach the “upstream
> branch contains upstream git history” change in the best way.
> Suggestions/tips welcome.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Michael Stapelberg
> <stapelberg at debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:44 AM, Martín Ferrari <tincho at tincho.org>
> wrote:
> >> On 09/11/17 04:24, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> At least for our transition period, we’ll have to use origtargz.
> >>
> >> Yes, but only for -2 and up releases. For -1, origtargz would do the
> >> same as gbp (AFAIK).
> >
> > Yes, for -1 releases, users supply the orig tarball :)
> >
> >>
> >>> I’m happy to pro-actively add compression algorithm/level options and
> >>> evaluate at a later time whether that worked. I think just testing
> >>> across different machines is a good start, but we should also pass the
> >>> test of time — perhaps we can easily simulate that by testing on
> >>> stable/oldstable.
> >> Not sure if we need to devote a lot of time to this, after all, the
> >> worst that can happen is a rejected upload because of checksum
> mismatches.
> >
> > Personally, I find rejected uploads super frustrating, especially
> > because of the large delay in between the action and the result (up to
> > half an hour).
> >
> > I’d really like to define a workflow which makes them a thing of the
> > past. For the time being, this is using origtargz.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Michael
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
--
Best regards,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/attachments/20180123/cbc3dd35/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Pkg-go-maintainers
mailing list