[pkg-go] Creating RFS bugs and maybe consider posting to the new ML

Alexandre Viau aviau at debian.org
Fri Jul 27 13:53:44 BST 2018


On 2018-07-27 08:40 AM, Paride Legovini wrote:
> Alexandre Viau wrote on 27/07/2018:
>> On 2018-07-27 08:19 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> Honestly, I would try to aim to remove the need for RFS completely.
>> Seeing what package is waiting to be sponsored isn't enough for me. Bugs
>> also contain message threads with comments/requests from the sponsor.
> I always used the ITP bug for this kind of discussion, and I think it's
> enough. Having to open, follow, handle and close two bugs for a single
> upload seems too much to me. In the Rust team the ITP is normally
> skipped too.

Ah, right. Using the ITP makes sense. I agree that this would more than
enough.

-- 
Alexandre Viau
aviau at debian.org


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 858 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/attachments/20180727/3c24d2d2/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list