[pkg-go] golang-github-remyoudompheng-go-liblzma_0.0~git20190301.da7c45f-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Lluis Campos]

Hi Thorsten,

Sorry for the direct contact. I just wanted to let you know that the 
Copyright issue was solved upstream and we uploaded again the package 
one week ago [1].

It is sitting in the NEW queue and I would very much appreciate if you 
have some time to look at it

Thank you!

Best regards,

Lluís Campos

[1] 
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/golang-github-remyoudompheng-go-liblzma_0.0~git20190506.81bf2d4-1.html

On 06.05.2019 09:26, Lluis Campos wrote:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Thanks for looking into the package and for the insightful input.
>
>
> On 05.05.2019 20:14, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> the file debian/copyright shall contain all copyright information 
>> from upstreams files. We don't have to be better than upstream but we 
>> also should not add information where we think upstream might agree. 
>> Of course we can tell upstream that there is a problem. Lluis 
>> commendably did this with his PR. Until this is settled, a comment 
>> would be great.
> I will try again to contact upstream and see if the author is willing 
> to accept the Copyright PR. If I don't get a response in few days 
> time, then I will follow your advise and do option a/ suggested by 
> Andreas
>
>>
>> On Sun, 5 May 2019, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>>> a/ drop the patch and upload again (but I suspect the discrepancy
>>>   between debian/copyright and upstream will cause a reject)
>>
>> I am not sure why you think there is a discrepancy. go_spec.html was 
>> created 2011 (at least the header says so), so it is not wrong to 
>> state 2011-2012 in LICENSE. It might be questionable that upstream is 
>> the only author of that document but than at least the 
>> debian/copyright is incomplete.
>> Anyway, one year difference between the information in LICENSE and 
>> information in file headers (especially if there are files with no 
>> information at all) are not a reason for a REJECT.
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
>
>>
>>   Thorsten
>>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Lluís
>