[pkg-golang-devel] golang-1.7_1.7~rc3-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Michael Hudson-Doyle]

On 22 July 2016 at 14:04, Tianon Gravi <admwiggin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Since this is still just a release candidate, IMO we shouldn't do that for
> any packages in the archive unless they actually require Go 1.7.  Once it
> hits GA and we switch golang-defaults, then it's worth considering binNMU
> IMO.
>
> (Sorry for html, top post, and brevity; am currently mobile)

I agree with this I think -- definitely not before golang-defaults
depends on golang-1.7 and after that I tend to the opinion that we
should only do packages people care enough to make a fuss over.

Cheers,
mwh

> On 21 Jul 2016 18:53, "Peter Colberg" <peter at colberg.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recompiled acmetool using golang-1.7 and adding to debian/rules
>>
>> export PATH := /usr/lib/go-1.7/bin:$(PATH)
>>
>> On amd64 the executable is 25% smaller compared to golang-1.6. :-)
>>
>> Are you planning to submit binNMUs for all binary golang packages,
>> or should that be done per package by the respective maintainers?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pkg-golang-devel mailing list
>> pkg-golang-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-golang-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-golang-devel mailing list
> pkg-golang-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-golang-devel