[pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/api/next.txt

[Michael Stapelberg]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Niels Thykier <niels at thykier.net> wrote:

> Michael Stapelberg:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle <
> > michael.hudson at canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >>> 0.7.0+ds-3), golang-protobuf-extensions (= 0+git20150513.fc2b8d3-4)
> >>> --
> >>> Package: golang-github-gosexy-gettext-dev
> >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
> >>> --
> >>> Package: golang-github-hashicorp-go-msgpack-dev
> >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
> >>> --
> >>> Package: golang-github-stretchr-objx-dev
> >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
> >>> --
> >>> Package: golang-github-kr-pty-dev
> >>> Built-Using: golang (= 2:1.6.1-2)
> >>>
> >>> This case could be ignored by the rebuild scripts, or binnmus could be
> >>> trigerred to get rid of the other versions. I'm not sure it makes sense
> >>> to ship
> >>> that many copies of golang in stretch.
> >>>
> >>> I think I read something about an organized plan to get rid of such
> extra
> >>> packages using binnmus, but maybe I was dreaming. Ccing debian-release@
> .
> >>>
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >
> > Updating or dropping the field seems fine with me. Could you do these 4
> > binNMUs so that we can close out this bug please? :)
> >
>
> They seem to be arch:all packages.  We cannot binNMU arch:all packages,
> only architecture dependent ones.  :-/
>

Okay. How do you suggest we rectify this issue instead, then?

-- 
Best regards,
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-golang-devel/attachments/20170421/5cf33ea8/attachment.html>