[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#509239: Bug#509239: Bug#509239: josm: [needs-packaging] Update to r1137

[Andreas Putzo]

On Dec 22  21:07, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 22/12/2008 alle 15.14 +0100, Andreas Putzo ha scritto:
> > > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn release)
> > > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ? 
> > 
> > My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal
> > preference. But josm now has a 'latest more or less stable' svn revision
> > which might be easier to distinguish than a timestamp-like version.
> 
> I think too it's better to use the svn release versioning, which is
> easier to match with the upstream status than the timstamp. And also the
> "more or less stable" revision is a good idea, because makes us able to
> select the better version to package.

That's something upstream introduced. Because they don't want to or don't
have time to provide a stable josm vesion they agreed on linking one
svn revision that is considered more or less stable. 

Cheers,
Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20081222/6686576d/attachment.pgp