[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#604714: libhdf5-mpi-dev: Wrong MPI dependency on LAM platforms

Adam C Powell IV hazelsct at debian.org
Tue Nov 23 23:19:05 UTC 2010


Hello again,

Please discard the last patch, a better one is attached.

-Adam

On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 13:57 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Package: libhdf5-mpi-dev
> Version: 1.8.4-patch1-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: patch
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> The libhdf5-mpi-dev package depends on libopenmpi-dev whether the
> platform defaults to openmpi or lam.  This is because it checks
> the /etc/alternatives symlink to mpi, which will always point to openmpi
> for hdf5, because it build-depends on all of the MPI implementations,
> and OpenMPI has the highest priority.
> 
> (This was my mistake in copying the old PETSc MPI rule; PETSc's build
> process installs only the arch's default MPI so there's only
> one /etc/alternatives candidate.)
> 
> The attached patch vs. current SVN checks the dependency of the
> mpi-default-dev package instead, so it is always consistent with
> mpi-defaults.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hdf5-correct-mpi.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20101123/009204a8/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20101123/009204a8/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list