Comments regarding gdal_1.10.0-0~exp1_i386.changes

[Francesco P. Lovergine]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 06:24:16AM +0000, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> why does libgdal1h provide libgdal1? If it is binary compatible why was the
> package name changed? If it is not binary compatible it shouldn't claim
> otherwise.
> 

Indeed it is not due to dropped tiff/geotiff functions. Let me re-upload with
the fix.

-- 
Francesco P. Lovergine