postgis: sid vs pgapt

Markus Wanner markus at bluegap.ch
Wed Oct 2 18:38:22 UTC 2013


On 10/02/2013 08:35 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 08:20 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
>> On 10/02/2013 08:19 PM, Alan Boudreault wrote:
>>> We'll do the change and push into the git repository. Is it ok?
>>>
> 
>> Not at the moment, please. We're in the middle of landing a rather
>> huge renaming diff to fix upgrades. See my original mail.
> 
> Any objection to pushing it to an Ubuntu specific branch?

No objection. If it doesn't have any 2.1-ish revision, you're safe.
Otherwise, you're unlikely to breake it any harder than it already is :-(

For the sake of completeness: upgrades from 2.0 to 2.1 (<= 2.1.0-4~)
result in conflicts on postgis.control, so 2.1 is not installable. If a
user didn't have any postgis-2.0 package installed, he should be fine.

Regards

Markus Wanner

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1594 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20131002/aa45beb4/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list