[ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED]

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

Hi Andreas and Pirmin,

On 09/19/2013 10:04 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> hmmm, this came a bit unexpected from looking at the changelog.  From
> what I can see at
> 
>    http://packages.debian.org/sid/osgearth
> 
> there is no later version than
> 
>    2.0+dfsg-4
> 
> uploaded to Debian.  The changelog in Git is mentioning a *lot* of
> intermediate versions targeting at "unstable" but they are not.  Usually
> you should tag something that was not released as "UNRELEASED" or if
> you upload to some other target distribution (for instance to Ubuntu)
> you should use this (and use a versioning like
> 
>   2.4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0
> 
> or so.  Could you please clarify what *really* was uploaded before?
> I would like to sort this out first before I simply build using
> 
>     --debbuildopts -sa
> 
> because I do not intend to upload with a missleading changelog.  In some
> sense the status at packages.debian.org is matching the tags 
> 
> $ git tag | grep ^debian
> debian/1.3-3
> debian/1.3-4
> debian/1.4-2
> debian/1.4-3
> debian/1.4-4
> debian/1.4-5
> debian/1.4-6
> debian/1.4.1-1
> debian/2.0-1
> debian/2.0-2
> debian/2.0-4
> debian/2.0rc4-1
> debian/2.4-1
> 
> Which means "2.1.1+dfsg-1" and 2.4-[23] are missing - no idea about
> "2.4-1".  Pirmin, could you please shed some light into this?

Most outdated GIS packages in Debian are usually more actively
maintained in the UbuntuGIS PPA. osgEarth is no different.

Version 2.1.1+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on
launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for oneiric.

Version 2.4.0+dfsg-1 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on
launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise.

Version 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is missing from the UbuntuGIS PPA, and was probably
never uploaded (anywhere public).

Version 2.4.0+dfsg-3 was uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA, and is listed on
launchpad in ubuntugis-unstable for precise and raring.

https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugis/+archive/ubuntugis-unstable/+packages?field.name_filter=osgearth&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=

It's probably a good idea to rename the tags to ubuntu/<version> to
reflect the destination of the packaging. The two Debian releases can be
tagged debian/<version>

We can fix the changelog for Debian by appending ~ubuntu1 to the
versions which were only uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA. I've done this
for MapCache on advise from Francesco, because MapCache has so far only
been uploaded to the UbuntuGIS PPA.

> 
> Kind regards
> 
>       Andreas.

Kind Regards,

Bas

> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org> -----
> 
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 21:50:11 +0000
> From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster at ftp-master.debian.org>
> To: Debian GIS Project <pkg-grass-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org>, Bas Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl>, tille at debian.org
> Subject: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes REJECTED
> 
> 
> 
> osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg-4.dsc refers to non-existing file: osgearth_2.4.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
> Perhaps you need to include it in your upload?
> 
> ===
> 
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> concerns.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
> Pkg-grass-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 


-- 
GnuPG: 0xE88D4AF1 (new) / 0x77A975AD (old)