Bug#757972: osm2pgsql: Transition to postgresql-9.4

Markus Wanner markus at bluegap.ch
Thu Aug 14 14:03:39 UTC 2014


On 08/12/2014 10:53 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> As postgis is also in the Recommends, the extra Recommends:
> postgresql-9.4-postgis-2.1 should be redundant and could as well be
> removed so osm2pgsql doesn't need to track the PostgreSQL
> version. This would be the nicer solution imho.

As discussed, the suggestion from postgis has been upgraded to a
recommendation. Starting with postgis_2.1.3+dfsg-4 (currently in the NEW
queue), it's therefore sufficient to (only) recommend postgis, rather
than postgresql-X.Y-postgis.

Regards

Markus Wanner


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1513 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20140814/3b927700/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list