gdal_1.10.1+dfsg-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

Andreas Tille andreas at an3as.eu
Mon Jan 13 08:05:16 UTC 2014


Hi Bas,

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:17:39AM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 01/12/2014 11:48 PM, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz: Does not match file already existing in the pool.
> 
> It looks like the initial gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz was not checked
> out from the pristine-tar branch.
> 
> I downloaded the orig.tar.gz from snapshot.debian.org, and compared it
> them to one checked out by pristine-tar, the pristine-tar one doesn't
> contain the .gitignore file.
> 
> Now I wonder if it makes sense to fix the pristine-tar branch to  use
> the tarball as uploaded to the archive. I think it does, because the
> upstream tarball also contains the .gitignore file.

Yes.  I think enabling usual git-buildpackage to create a package
resulting in the very same orig.tar.gz as it is on the Debian mirror
should be the way to go.  Just tell me if this is fixed and I should
do a rebuild.

Kind regards

        Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list