Bug#828509: postgis: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Kurt Roeckx kurt at roeckx.be
Sun Jun 26 18:11:36 UTC 2016


On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 06:03:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo
> 
> Hi Kurt,
> 
> Thanks for your work on OpenSSL.
> 
> On 06/26/2016 12:23 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
> > OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
> > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/postgis_2.2.2+dfsg-2_amd64-20160529-1510
> 
> postgis has no direct dependency on libssl nor libcrypto. There is no
> clear openssl related failure in the buildlog, but it does show that it
> only installs the custom openssl dependencies and relies on unstable for
> the rest of the packages. So none of postgis build dependencies have
> been rebuilt with the new openssl packages. I suspect this issue is
> caused by postgres still linking to the old openssl whereas the new
> openssl is installed in the build environment.
> 
> > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
> > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.
> > 
> > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.
> 
> postgis is not among the reverse dependencies for openssl in the
> auto-openssl transition tracker [0], so I guess postgis was only rebuilt
> for your tests because it build depends on libssl-dev.
> 
> I cannot reproduce the issue with the libssl-dev from experimental, so
> I'm starting to suspect this issue is a false positive.
> 
> Can you confirm that the openssl update to 1.1.0 only affects packaging
> linking its libssl and/or libcrypto?

Only packages linking to libssl/libcrypto should be affected.  I'm
not sure why you build depend on libssl if you don't.

Anyway, if you can't reproduce this, feel free to close it.


Kurt



More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list