Bug#947976: license problems
Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebastic at xs4all.nl
Fri Jan 3 06:57:40 GMT 2020
On 1/2/20 11:58 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md not accounted for in d/copyright (it's CC-BY-4.0).
You really had to dig for that one.
> Copyright for docs/auth.html wrong, and the file seems to be generated
> from auth.md -- can you confirm we can regenerate it with tools in the
> archive?
What makes you say the copyright is wrong? It falls under the "Files: *"
section, which is BSD-3-Clause after the relicensing from the NetCDF
license.
doxygen is used to generate the HTML docs, which is part of the build
process.
> What reason is there to think that docs\unidata_logo_cmyk.png is
> redistributible?
What reason is there to think that it isn't?
Unidata develops NetCDF and chose to include their logo in the source
tree to use it in the (generated) documentation.
> Can docs/docmap.pdf be rebuilt?
Why do you care?
> Are the .dmp, .hdf4 and .nc files in dap4_test/, hdf4_test/ and
> h5_test/ perhaps generated files? Can they be regenerated?
They are test data, they shouldn't be regenerated.
> I think that it would be best to explicitly include the Unidata
> copyright line from COPYRIGHT in addition to the "University
> Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata" line.
"2018 Unidata"
is already part of
"1988-2019, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research/Unidata"
I don't see why including the former is in any way better.
> Please take care of these issues.
I've added license & copyright for CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, that is enough to
fix this issue in my opinion. If you also demand that I fix the pedantic
issues, I'll instead start working on removing netcdf and everything
that depends on it from Debian as I don't enjoy working on these
packages. I only do so because it's currently a dependency of gdal, but
that can be changed.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
More information about the Pkg-grass-devel
mailing list