Bug#949468: satpy: autopkgtest regression due to new pygac
Antonio Valentino
antonio.valentino at tiscali.it
Wed Jan 22 07:41:33 GMT 2020
Dear Gianfranco,
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:03:01 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg at debian.org> wrote:
> control: severity -1 important
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:28:40 +0100 Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg at debian.org> wrote:
> > Source: satpy
> > Version: 0.19.1-1
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hello, looks like pygac update regressed the testsuite.
> > I requested a new run in Debian, but in the meanwhile you can see a run here:
> > https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/s/satpy/20200120_195040_eac9b@/log.gz
> >
> > or here:
> > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/satpy/0.19.1-1/autopkgtest
> >
> > (and even inside the build process itself the error is thrown out, but for some reasons the testsuite errors are somewhat ignored at least in that part)
> >
>
> looks like the debian autopkgtest is green, and the "killed" is an ubuntu-only thing.
>
> However, my patch has been merged upstream, so the gac issue is fixed.
>
> G.
Sorry Gianfranco but the problem is not clear to me.
Apart for the killed test run, satpy is failing in testing due to a
missing dependency (behave) which has been removed form testing.
I don't see any issue related to pygac, am I missing something?
Also can you please give me a pointer to the patch that has been merged
upstream?
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
More information about the Pkg-grass-devel
mailing list