pykml_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Antonio Valentino
antonio.valentino at tiscali.it
Wed Jun 15 07:31:14 BST 2022
Hi Bas,
is there still any problem with pykml?
cheers
antonio
Il 12/06/22 17:21, Antonio Valentino ha scritto:
> Dear Bas,
> I went on and removed "kml22gx.xsd" from the package.
> It should be now ready for a new review/upload.
>
> Regarding pysolid I have still not received feedback form upstream.
> Probably we can go on with the current version.
> We can update the copyright file if/once the upstream update the licensing.
>
>
> I kindly as you to review/uload pykml and pysolid again.
>
>
> cheers
> antonio
>
> Il 11/06/22 20:17, Antonio Valentino ha scritto:
>> Dear Sebastiaan,
>> I'm having problems in finding the exact license for kml22gx.xsd.
>> By the way it seems that the file is not actually used in the Python
>> module, it is only used for testing.
>>
>> I'm thinking to remove it for the debian package.
>>
>> Do you have any advice?
>>
>>
>> regards
>> Antonio
>>
>>
>> Il 05/06/22 20:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi Antonio,
>>>
>>> please also mention at least:
>>> pykml-0.2.0/src/pykml/schemas/ogckml22.xsd
>>> pykml-0.2.0/src/pykml/schemas/xAL.xsd
>>> pykml-0.2.0/src/pykml/schemas/kml22gx.xsd
>>>
>>> in your debian/copyright.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Thorsten
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>>> concerns.
>>>
>>
>
--
Antonio Valentino
More information about the Pkg-grass-devel
mailing list