pykdtree_1.3.6+ds-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebastic at xs4all.nl
Tue Nov 1 10:17:25 GMT 2022


On 11/1/22 10:22, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 11/1/22 10:03, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>> Il 01/11/22 09:27, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>>> On 11/1/22 09:17, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>>>> Il 01/11/22 08:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>>>>> On 11/1/22 08:37, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>>>>>> Il 01/11/22 08:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>>>>>>  > Testing migration is blocked by autopkgtest failures:
>>>>>>  >
>>>>>>  >   https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pykdtree
>>>>>>
>>>>>> satpy currently fails autopkdtest mainly due to the recent update 
>>>>>> of xarray (2022.10.0).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have pushed to git a small patch backported form upstream but 
>>>>>> the main issue is still there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to [1], updating both xarray and dask to v2022.10.0 
>>>>>> would work.
>>>>>> An keeping bot to the previous version would work as well.
>>>>>> Updating only xarray seems to create problems to satpy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are to bugreports: 1022255 [2] for both xarray and satpy, 
>>>>>> and 1022338 [3] for satpy only, but I thing that the source of the 
>>>>>> problem is the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure what is the best way to proceed.
>>>>>> Maybe I could submit a patch for updating dask to the latest version.
>>>>>> Do you have recommendations?
>>>>>
>>>>> Getting dask updated seems like the best option.
>>>>>
>>>>> Getting satpy removed from testing would resolve this issue for 
>>>>> pykdtree.
>>>>
>>>> yes, satpy is currently scheduled for auto-removal due to its 
>>>> dependency on g2clib and python-pint that seem to have release 
>>>> critical bugs.
>>>> By the way I do not think it will be actually removed form testing.
>>>> The issue with xarray is in unstable only.
>>>
>>> #1022338 affects the version in testing so that will also become a 
>>> reason for autoremoval.
>>
>> umh, the version in testing is the dame of unstable but in testing 
>> there is no problem with satpy.
>> Probably #1022338 should be re assigned to xarray.
> 
> The autopkgtest of satpy from testing fails with pykdtree from unstable.
> 
> That's using python3-xarray (2022.06.0-7) & python3-dask 
> (2022.02.0+dfsg-2) from testing instead of python3-xarray (2022.10.0-1) 
> from unstable.
> 
> This suggests a different issue than #1022255 or #1022338.

satpy (0.37.1-1) FTBFS in bookworm due to test failures:

=========================== short test summary info 
============================
FAILED 
satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_modis_l1b.py::TestModisL1b::test_load_longitude_latitude[modis_l1b_nasa_mod021km_file-True-False-False-1000]
FAILED 
satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_modis_l1b.py::TestModisL1b::test_load_longitude_latitude[modis_l1b_imapp_1000m_file-True-False-False-1000]
FAILED 
satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_modis_l1b.py::TestModisL1b::test_load_longitude_latitude[modis_l1b_nasa_1km_mod03_files-True-True-True-250]
FAILED 
satpy/tests/reader_tests/test_modis_l2.py::TestModisL2::test_load_longitude_latitude[modis_l2_nasa_mod35_file-True-False-False-1000]
= 4 failed, 1691 passed, 8 skipped, 64 deselected, 7 xfailed, 782 
warnings in 429.18s (0:07:09) =

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
  GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1




More information about the Pkg-grass-devel mailing list