Bug#1061961: fyba: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Sebastiaan Couwenberg
sebastic at xs4all.nl
Tue Jan 30 15:44:38 GMT 2024
On 1/30/24 16:32, Lukas Märdian wrote:
> Am 30.01.24 um 16:06 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
>> On 1/30/24 15:57, Lukas Märdian wrote:
>>> But please remember that this is meant to only hit experimental for
>>> now, until the dpkg change lands in unstable.
>>> So please don't upload it into unstable just yet.
>>
>> gdal will need to be rebuilt once fyba moves to unstable, how will
>> these transitions be coordinated?
>>
>> Regular transitions are staged in experimental, and once the Release
>> Team gives the go-ahead the package is uploaded to unstable after
>> which they schedule binNMUs.
>>
>> Presumably there will be and overarching t64 transition to determine
>> the order in which packages need to be moved to unstable triggering
>> their respective transition which may include packages having their
>> own t64 transition pending in experimental.
>
> Please see prior discussion in https://bugs.debian.org/1036884 for the
> overall game plan.
That only mentions:
"
- sourceful NMUs of all the libraries will be reuploaded to unstable
(without binaries, so that they can be promoted to testing without
additional uploads).
"
Should we assume that to mean that everything will be uploaded at the
same time without taking inter-dependencies into account?
How will the t64 transitions be coordinated with the release team?
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
More information about the Pkg-grass-devel
mailing list