Doris not migrating to testing

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

On 6/6/24 8:05 AM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
> Il 01/06/24 19:53, Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha scritto:
>> On 6/1/24 7:33 PM, Antonio Valentino wrote:
>>> Maybe it is just too early, but the message in the tracker [1] looks 
>>> misleading to me.
>>
>> It is certainly misleading, doris is only available for amd64, but 
>> arm64 is part of NOBREAKALL_ARCHES alongside amd64, see:
>>
>>   https://release.debian.org/britney/britney.conf
>>
>> arm64 replaced i386 there some time ago.
>>
>>   https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/-/merge_requests/51
>>
>> You'll need to ask the Release Team for a britney hint to get doris to 
>> migrate without having an arm64 package available.
> 
> Before contacting the release team I was wondering if a new upload could 
> not fix things.
> 
> In principle there is no particular reason why doris should not build on 
> arm, and I thin that we had it in the past.
> 
> I also remember that at some point we decided to ask for the removal of 
> all non x86_64 architectures, but I do not remember exactly why.
> Unfortunately I was not able to find the old email thread where we 
> discussed it.
> Do you remember something?

https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2023-December/104215.html

Packages requiring binary uploads should only be available on amd64.

See also the release.d.o bugreport linked in the above thread:

  https://bugs.debian.org/1059226

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
  GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1