bpack_1.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Antonio Valentino
antonio.valentino at tiscali.it
Mon Jun 17 06:32:33 BST 2024
Dear Thorsten,
Il 16/06/24 23:39, Thorsten Alteholz ha scritto:
>
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
>> On 6/14/24 8:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>>> according to policy (5.2) the source package stanza should not have a
>>> Description:
>>
>> Policy doesn't specify that Source stanza cannot have a Description.
>
> Policy does in 5.2: it defines a list of fields in the source package
> stanza. Description: is not part of that list.
>
>> dpkg supports this since 1.19.0 as documented in deb-substvars(5).
>
> I don't read any man page or dig into all bugs before accepting a
> package. I rely on the contents of the Debian Policy document.
> Unfortunately today I had to learn that this is an unreliable source of
> information.
> End of 2021 it was requested in #998165 that Description: should be
> allowed. Sadly work on this bug was stalled and the change doesn't make
> it into policy. So blame this REJECT on the idle policy editors.
>
> Thorsten
Thanks for digging into it and for reviewing/accepting the package.
kind regards
--
Antonio Valentino
More information about the Pkg-grass-devel
mailing list