Bug#1122073: satpy doesn't handle NaN appropriately on riscv64

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

Control: tags -1 pending
Control: fixed -1 satpy/0.59.0-2

On 12/6/25 5:02 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As part of a request to help satpy to testing, it was discovered by Aurelien that satpy doesn't handle NaN properly and he provides a patch, see below.

Brought to the attention of the maintainer via [0] and applied in git [1] before this issue was filed.

[0] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2025-December/116850.html
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/satpy/-/commit/9a07ab253d6e0387a0d8bb50de2e8cdf577c35cb

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
  PGP Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1