Bug#1135006: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable

[Carles Pina i Estany]

Subject: gis-devel: recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev, libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev which are not in unstable
Package: gis-devel
Version: 0.0.22
Usertags: package-relations package-relations-recommends
Severity: wishlist

Dear maintainer(s),

I noticed that package gis-devel recommends libcitygml-dev, libemos-dev,
libhdf4-alt-dev and libogdi-dev, which are currently not available in
unstable.

See:

- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libcitygml-dev : dropped from testing 
  on 2025-09-10
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libemos-dev : removed from testing
  (2026-02-02, perhaps will re-appear?)
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libhdf4-alt-dev : the source package
  libhdf4 does not generate any binary named libhdf4-alt-dev . Perhaps
  it used to do it time ago? or  libhdf4-dev is the one to recommend
  now?
- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libogdi-dev : removed from testing on
  2025-09-08

Would it make sense to remove or update them?

Thank you for your time,

PS[0]: I am developing a tool to detect such issues:
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations . Reports are
manually reviewed before submission. If you would prefer not to receive
such reports (for specific packages, all of your maintained packages,
etc.), please let me know. Any other feedback is welcomed as well.

PS[1]: more information available in
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/README.md
and
https://salsa.debian.org/carlespina/check-relations/-/blob/main/docs/bug-report-extra-info.md

-- 
Carles Pina i Estany
https://carles.pina.cat | carles at pina.cat | cpina at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20260426/12758b22/attachment.sig>