Bug#1144480: qgis regressed in reproducibility

[Jochen Sprickerhof]

* Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic at xs4all.nl> [2026-08-15 19:50]:
>On 8/15/26 7:43 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
>>src:qgis in unstable can't migrate to testing because the QA
>>infrastructure couldn't reproduce the some binary packages in
>>unstable while it could reproduce the version in testing [1, 2].
>
>AFAIK qgis has never been reproducible.

For completeness: Britney evaluates reproducibility per binary package 
independently. That's why it states:

Migration status for qgis (3.44.13+dfsg-1 to 3.44.13+dfsg-2): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
∙ ∙ Piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/q/qgis.html
∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on arm64: libqgis-app3.44.13, libqgis-gui3.44.13
∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on armhf: libqgis-core3.44.13
∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on i386: libqgis-app3.44.13
∙ ∙ Missing build on riscv64
∙ ∙ Lintian check waiting for test results on riscv64 - info
∙ ∙ Too young, only 3 of 5 days old
∙ ∙ Depends: qgis glibc
Additional info (not blocking):
∙ ∙ Updating qgis will fix bugs in testing: #1143800
∙ ∙ Not reproduced on amd64 (not a regression): python3-qgis-common

I.e. it is reproducible in testing except for python3-qgis-common.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/attachments/20260815/3b51805e/attachment.sig>