osrm-backend_26.4.1+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Anton Gladky]

Am Sa., 2. Mai 2026 um 06:27 Uhr schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebastic at xs4all.nl>:
>
> You've reintroduced a package, but not reused the existing repo:
>
>   https://salsa.debian.org/debian-gis-team/osrm/

That is intentional. It has a new source and a binary names.

> You also didn't follow any of the team conventions documented in our policy:
>
>   https://debian-gis-team.pages.debian.net/policy/

What particular?

> Nor is your packaged lintian clean:
>
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_contract.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_customize.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_extract.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_partition.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_store.so.26.4.1
>   I: libosrm26: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libosrm_update.so.26.4.1
>   I: osrm-backend source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/10_use-system-libraries.patch]
>
> You should use pkgkde-symbolshelper for the C++ libraries or add an override like we do for saga for example.
> It looks like the patch should be marked as Forwarded: not-needed instead of no.

Thanks for suggestions,

Anton