Bug#273847: marked as done (grub-splashimages is not installable on !i386)

Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:48:02 -0700

Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:32:50 -0700
with message-id <20040929053244.GD20302@mauritius.dodds.net>
and subject line grub-splashimages is not installable on !i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 13:06:05 +0000
>From bunk@fs.tum.de Tue Sep 28 06:06:04 2004
Return-path: <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5] 
	by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CCHgC-0008Aw-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:06:04 -0700
Received: (qmail 17222 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 13:06:02 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
  by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 13:06:02 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 43161BB593; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:05:32 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: grub-splashimages is not installable on !i386
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:05:32 +0200
Message-Id: <20040928130532.43161BB593@r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: grub-splashimages
Version: 1.0
Severity: grave

grub-splashimages depends on grub which is only available
on i386 and hurd-i386.

I don't see any reason why it's binary-all instead of
i386-only given that it's uninstallable on all other
architectures (and this isn't likely to change).

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273847-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2004 05:32:28 +0000
>From vorlon@debian.org Tue Sep 28 22:32:28 2004
Return-path: <vorlon@debian.org>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [66.93.39.86] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CCX4m-0002OY-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:32:28 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B92F8171D4A; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:32:50 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
To: 273847-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: grub-splashimages is not installable on !i386
Message-ID: <20040929053244.GD20302@mauritius.dodds.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: 273847-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The package contains architecture-independent data which is only useful
when coupled with an arch: any package that only builds on certain
architectures.  Building the package as arch: all with a dependency on
the arch: any grub is perfectly reasonable in the interest of saving
archive space, and does not carry with it any obligation to be
installable on architectures where it is not useful.

Therefore I am closing this report, as this is not a bug.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBWkj8KN6ufymYLloRAmGjAKCLq6m30U/6R8cnwESOv+uBrIc1tACgu45+
6aJNOVIuuC6BJhnbcZRdaU8=
=knyS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jCrbxBqMcLqd4mOl--