Bug#399171: documentation

[Robert Millan]

I'm adding 399171 at bugs.debian.org manually for the last time.

Sorry, but I refuse to continue this discussion untill you fix your mail
headers, and include proper Cc and To information instead of these
"undisclosed-recipients".

Thanks for your understanding

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:58:52AM -0400, waldeck at hk2.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
> > Yes, just like with every other binary.  Why is that a problem?
> 
> I worked in a train and had no possibility to download further packages
> like the source package and the grub-doc package.
> So it is necessary that the information in the grub-disk package is sufficient. 
> Which is absolutely not the case.
> If the correct usage of grub-disk requires grub-doc it should be a dependency.
> 
> > You don't use binaries to modify stuff, you use source code.  For this iso
> > image it's just the same as any other binary, like /usr/sbin/grub.
> 
> This makes no sense! 
> 
> If I want to modify ONLY the ISO image 
> why should I compile the whole source package at all?
> 
> I modified the existing ISO image because the content 
> of this package should work out of the box!
> 
> Dr. Markus Waldeck
> 
> 

-- 
Robert Millan

My spam trap is honeypot at aybabtu.com.  Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters.  Writing to it will get you added to my black list.