Bug#527068: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8)
Robert Millan
rmh at aybabtu.com
Fri Jul 24 15:41:27 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 01:45:56PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:29:47PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Hi Felix,
> > >
> > > On Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > We could remove the `ascii.pf2' and so only break the graphical terminal
> > > > on a package purge, but I don't think it would be good to remove the
> > > > whole /boot/grub. Maybe people want to purge the package but still wants
> > > > to have a working grub2.
> > >
> > > Huh, they remove, even purge the grub-pc package and still expect it to be
> > > working? If I remove apache, I dont expect the webserver to be still working.
> > >
> > > I dont understand ;-)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Apache doesn't install to your MBR. As long as GRUB is in MBR, user will
> > expect it to work. We can't wipe out files that are critical to its boot
> > process because it's not something that every user will expect. So the
> > only option is to be on the safe side.
> >
>
> Maybe we could add a debconf prompt on purge to clear all grub2 files
> from /boot/grub.
> But I think that should default to no
I agree. Should be fine, as long as it defaults to no.
> and so piuparts would still be not
> happy.
This is too critical. We can't compromise on it just for the sake of
making piuparts happy. Hopefully a debconf template will satisfy most
users.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
More information about the Pkg-grub-devel
mailing list