[Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: ghc: Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version

Louis Bettens louis at bettens.info
Sat Oct 12 07:25:10 UTC 2013


Sat Oct 12 07:22:41 UTC 2013  Louis Bettens <louis at bettens.info>
  * Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
  
  I forgot the d/copyright and [_<U+201C>_]upstream[_<U+201D>_] could mean GHC.
  
  Plus, this exact file isn't in the machine-readable format and I think it
  should mention the authors of Cabal. Shall I fix it?

    M ./changelog -2 +2
    M ./copyright +4

Sat Oct 12 07:22:41 UTC 2013  Louis Bettens <louis at bettens.info>
  * Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
  
  I forgot the d/copyright and 
upstream
 could mean GHC.
  
  Plus, this exact file isn't in the machine-readable format and I think it
  should mention the authors of Cabal. Shall I fix it?
diff -rN -u old-ghc/changelog new-ghc/changelog
--- old-ghc/changelog	2013-10-12 07:25:10.593554424 +0000
+++ new-ghc/changelog	2013-10-12 07:25:10.625570586 +0000
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-ghc (7.6.3-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ghc (7.6.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
   * Removing gcc from control file build-deps
 
   [ Louis Bettens ]
-  * fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
+  * fix cabal bug #1087 in current version
 
  -- Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it>  Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:14:21 +0200
 
diff -rN -u old-ghc/copyright new-ghc/copyright
--- old-ghc/copyright	2013-10-12 07:25:10.577561922 +0000
+++ new-ghc/copyright	2013-10-12 07:25:10.629541075 +0000
@@ -129,3 +129,7 @@
 CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
 OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE
 USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+Files: debian/patches/cabal-bug-1087.patch
+Copyright: 2012 Johan Tibell
+License: BSD3-Clause




More information about the Pkg-haskell-commits mailing list