[Pkg-haskell-commits] darcs: ghc: Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
Louis Bettens
louis at bettens.info
Sat Oct 12 07:25:10 UTC 2013
Sat Oct 12 07:22:41 UTC 2013 Louis Bettens <louis at bettens.info>
* Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
I forgot the d/copyright and [_<U+201C>_]upstream[_<U+201D>_] could mean GHC.
Plus, this exact file isn't in the machine-readable format and I think it
should mention the authors of Cabal. Shall I fix it?
M ./changelog -2 +2
M ./copyright +4
Sat Oct 12 07:22:41 UTC 2013 Louis Bettens <louis at bettens.info>
* Re: fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
I forgot the d/copyright and
upstream
could mean GHC.
Plus, this exact file isn't in the machine-readable format and I think it
should mention the authors of Cabal. Shall I fix it?
diff -rN -u old-ghc/changelog new-ghc/changelog
--- old-ghc/changelog 2013-10-12 07:25:10.593554424 +0000
+++ new-ghc/changelog 2013-10-12 07:25:10.625570586 +0000
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-ghc (7.6.3-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+ghc (7.6.3-5) unstable; urgency=low
[ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
* Removing gcc from control file build-deps
[ Louis Bettens ]
- * fix upstream bug #1087 in current version
+ * fix cabal bug #1087 in current version
-- Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco at yahoo.it> Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:14:21 +0200
diff -rN -u old-ghc/copyright new-ghc/copyright
--- old-ghc/copyright 2013-10-12 07:25:10.577561922 +0000
+++ new-ghc/copyright 2013-10-12 07:25:10.629541075 +0000
@@ -129,3 +129,7 @@
CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE
USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+
+Files: debian/patches/cabal-bug-1087.patch
+Copyright: 2012 Johan Tibell
+License: BSD3-Clause
More information about the Pkg-haskell-commits
mailing list