[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#397058: Bug#397058: Is this really needed?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 26.02.2010, 23:24 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Do you thing it worths to try a build on all architectures that doesn't have
> GHCi, knowing that they will fail, for all new versions of these packages, just
> to make sure that, when ghci works on them, they'll build too?  I don't think
> it's a good exchange here.

but it’s not what the Architecture field is for, AFAIK. The correct
thing to do is to have the non-working package/arch combination entered
in the not-for-us database of the buildd system, so that the package
will not be tried for building. But this is, also AFAIK, the job of the
porters.



Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20100227/094fa0c9/attachment.pgp>