[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#573925: How should the Haskell maintainers work then?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 23.03.2010, 16:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> We're considering moving the CDBS class hlibrary.mk from haskell-devscripts to
> the cdbs package.  In haskell-devscripts there's also some dh_haskell_*
> (shell) scripts; do you think they also should move to the debhelper package,
> or it's better to keep them in a separate package, as they are now?
> 
> Other haskellers: What's your opinion on this?

Given that the cdbs files is closely tied to the dh_* files, and both
are closely tight to the Haskell Packaging and the Haskell Team, I think
it does not make sense to put them in the general cdbs package.

I see haskell-devscripts as the equivalent to gnome-pkg-tools which also
includes cdbs files.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20100323/9f48fd2e/attachment.pgp>