[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#682527: haskell-yesod-routes: FTBFS: Don't use "ghc-ghci" virtual-package-name on Build-Depends
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
yama1066 at gmail.com
Mon Jul 23 18:37:41 UTC 2012
(2012-07-24 03:31 +0000), Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:47:47AM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
>> Of course, this bug must be FTBFS because the package which cannot exist
>> according to the architecture is specified.
>
> Yes, it will fail to build on an architecture that doesn't have ghc-ghci.
> However, since it would have not succeeded in the past without ghc-ghci,
> this is not an RC issue.
No.
The problem is specifying the package which "cannot exist by any means"
by some architectures as Build-Depends.
But I understood that this problem originates in the difference in the plan
of Haskell Policy and Debian Policy.
Regards,
--
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA 91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers
mailing list