[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#723022: Bug#723022: [pandoc] package split with only Recommends: causes FTBFS on other packages
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Sun Sep 15 18:04:56 UTC 2013
Quoting John MacFarlane (2013-09-15 18:25:16)
> +++ Jonas Smedegaard [Sep 15 13 16:30 ]:
> > Quoting Timo Weingärtner (2013-09-15 15:39:11)
> > > pandoc only Recommends: pandoc-data, so packages Build-Depending
> > > on pandoc for e.g. manpage generation will FTBFS.
> > >
> > > Please change the Recommends: into a Depends:
> >
> > Pandoc is usable without those datafiles, for some special uses.
> >
> > I believe the proper thing to do is for such packages to
> > build-depend also on pandoc-data.
>
> For what it's worth (from a non Debian insider), I think pandoc should
> depend on pandoc-data.
>
> Without pandoc-data, many invocations of pandoc will fail -- including
> any use of the --standalone (-s) option, and any attempt to produce a
> docx, epub, or odt.
Thanks for your input, John.
Here's from Debian Policy the definition of the "Recommends" field:
> This declares a strong, but not absolute, dependency.
>
> The `Recommends' field should list packages that would be found
> together with this one in all but unusual installations.
As I read the "many invocations" in your comment above as matching the
"all but unusual installations".
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20130915/8f6cb0de/attachment.sig>
More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers
mailing list