Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
Sun Dec 20 12:30:37 UTC 2015
On 12/20/2015 01:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> needs a lot of work != someone is doing a lot of work on it. So unless someone
> is and you didn't say it, or you are volunteering to do it, I'm not sure how the
> situation is going to improve.
Well, the person who made the change which broke ghc on armel said that
and I assume he is working on it in the future. His change, on the other
hand, improved ghc on armhf. So nothing is saying he is not improved
ghc on armel, too.
I don't understand the point of your message. I know that someone has
to do the work and I myself have already done a lot of work, too, not
just ghc. The message from the ghc is simply "we know it's broken and
we're going to fix it", that's all.
I assume ghc upstream development hasn't stopped, has it? Or what
exactly did you try to convey here?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz at debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz at physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
More information about the Pkg-haskell-maintainers
mailing list