Bug#1020246: Not an active maintainer, but

[Ilias Tsitsimpis]

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/ndmitchell/hoogle/issues/359

Hi Iustin,

On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:25PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
> AFAIK, both armel and armfh are low-powered/"slow" arches, but i386 is
> surprising. Maybe due to memory limits?
> 
> I wonder if tests shouldn't simply be restricted to amd64, arm64, ppc64el and
> s390x? This should give it enough of architecture heterogeneity to catch
> any problems that simply do not appear on amd64 (mainstream arch) (yes,
> I've been bitten by this in one package of mine).
> 
> This would be a cheap fix (one entry in the control file). Thoughts?
> (Anyone?) It seems this bug is the only one that prevents it from
> entering testing (and it's a leaf package).

Unfortunately it's not just the tests that fail, hoogle is currently
completely broken on all 32-bit architectures. We need to either fix it,
or remove hoogle from these architectures.

Best,

-- 
Ilias