Bug#1071151: ghc: Use extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64

[fanpeng]

On Fri, 17 May 2024 14:01:37 +0300 Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:

Yes, that's unregisterised. I'll try ghc 9.6.7-1~exp1 lately.

 > Hi!
 >
 > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:23AM, Peng Fan wrote:
 > > The reason for the above error is that "relocation R_LARCH_B26 overflow
 > > ......" occurs during static linking in the test-pandoc stage.
 > > Currently we have a verified method, don't need to skip test cases 
to solve "relocation R_LARCH_B26
 > > overflow ......" during static linking.
 > > The verified method is as follows,
 > > We need to add extra --ghc-options in d/rules on loong64 to 
increase jump-instructions's range.
 >
 > I assume ghc 9.4.7 that you currently have in loong64 is unregisterised.
 > Can you please run 'ghc --info' to confirm that?
 >
 > If that's the case, can you please try with ghc 9.6.7-1~exp1 from
 > experimental? I have done some extra work there in order to get a
 > registerised compiler on loong64.
 >
 > Thanks,
 >
 > --
 > Ilias
 >
 >

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-haskell-maintainers/attachments/20240601/dae4d3a8/attachment.htm>