Bug#341946: marked as done (ant: Ant 1.6.0+ requires at least JDK
1.2)
Debian Bug Tracking System
owner at bugs.debian.org
Mon Dec 5 07:48:11 UTC 2005
Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:38:01 +0100
with message-id <4393EE59.6060400 at gmx.de>
and subject line Bug#341946: ant: Ant 1.6.0+ requires at least JDK 1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2005 11:26:22 +0000
>From oystein at gisnas.net Sun Dec 04 03:26:22 2005
Return-path: <oystein at gisnas.net>
Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.58])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eis0c-0006A7-IH
for submit at bugs.debian.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 03:26:22 -0800
Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59])
by osl1smout1.broadpark.no
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <0IQZ00KVV1A36ZF0 at osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for
submit at bugs.debian.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:30:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([84.48.53.252]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004))
with ESMTP id <0IQZ00D5S17Q2P30 at osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for
submit at bugs.debian.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:28:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from oysteigi by localhost with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <oystein at gisnas.net>) id 1Eis1Z-000265-8E; Sun,
04 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:27:21 +0100
From: Oystein Gisnas <oystein at gisnas.net>
Subject: ant: Ant 1.6.0+ requires at least JDK 1.2
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit at bugs.debian.org>
Message-id: <20051204112721.8003.61825.reportbug at freebusy.raffen>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: submit at bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ant
Version: 1.6.5-3
Severity: normal
http://archive.apache.org/dist/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.6.0.html bullet number one upgrades Ant's JDK requirement from version 1.1 to 1.2. ant in Debian should do the same by removing "java1-runtime" from the Depends line.
As far as I can see, this would render #292577 and #291519 obsolete, since both users ran with gij, which only provides java1-runtime.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages ant depends on:
ii gij-4.0 [java1-runtime] 4.0.2-5j1 The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
pn kaffe | java-virtual-mach <none> (no description available)
ii libxerces2-java 2.6.2-3 Validating XML parser for Java wit
pi sun-j2sdk1.5 [java2-runti 1.5.0+update03 Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition,
Versions of packages ant recommends:
pn ant-optional <none> (no description available)
pi sun-j2sdk1.5 [java-compil 1.5.0+update03 Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition,
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 341946-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2005 07:37:30 +0000
>From WBaer at gmx.de Sun Dec 04 23:37:30 2005
Return-path: <WBaer at gmx.de>
Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.20] helo=mail.gmx.net)
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EjAuf-0001WI-SL
for 341946-done at bugs.debian.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:37:30 -0800
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Dec 2005 07:36:57 -0000
Received: from p5481B048.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.203]) [84.129.176.72]
by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 05 Dec 2005 08:36:57 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1941950
Message-ID: <4393EE59.6060400 at gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:38:01 +0100
From: Wolfgang Baer <WBaer at gmx.de>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Oystein Gisnas <oystein at gisnas.net>, 341946-done at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#341946: ant: Ant 1.6.0+ requires at least JDK 1.2
References: <20051204112721.8003.61825.reportbug at freebusy.raffen>
In-Reply-To: <20051204112721.8003.61825.reportbug at freebusy.raffen>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi Oystein,
Oystein Gisnas wrote:
> Package: ant
> Version: 1.6.5-3
> Severity: normal
>
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/ant/RELEASE-NOTES-1.6.0.html bullet number one upgrades Ant's JDK requirement from version 1.1 to 1.2. ant in Debian should do the same by removing "java1-runtime" from the Depends line.
java1-runtime in debian does not mean the packages only provide
a JDK 1.1 environment. Its used at present to differentiate
free and non-free jdks. I will close this bug report as its
invalid IMHO.
> As far as I can see, this would render #292577 and #291519 obsolete, since both users ran with gij, which only provides java1-runtime.
These bugs are obsolete because of the ongoing transition to the g++ 4.0
compiler in debian. During this transition gij components of the older
gij 3.3 and 3.4 was removed from debian.
I will close these bugs when I found time to test the same with gij 4.0
and it will work. They should only apply to stable currently.
Thanks,
Wolfgang
More information about the pkg-java-maintainers
mailing list