Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing
Steve Langasek
vorlon@debian.org
Wed Jan 5 02:21:02 2005
--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100,=20
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl> wrote:=20
> > * charva (- to 1.0.1-3)
> > + Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers
> > + Section: contrib/libs
> > + 342 days old (needed 10 days)
> > + libcharva1-java/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libcharva1-jni
> > NOTE: don't understand the above dependency issue...=20
> > + Valid candidate
> charva has some part written in java (arch: all) and some in C. I think
> I built it with my powerpc.
The testing scripts only check the installability of arch: all packages on
one of our architectures -- for obvious reasons, that architecture is i386.
libcharva1-java seems to be a rara avis, an arch: all package that's not
installable on i386. But it could be: I would suggest getting someone to do
a binary upload of libcharva1-jni on i386. In general, I think getting
contrib builds of JNI packages for both i386 and powerpc would be a good
idea.
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB27FiKN6ufymYLloRAuqAAJkB0gagyrGihY5YBsPYBSnhwuwoGgCgjkDj
j+5+6fzjRRHlv3sCgC1ZS+4=
=3o1P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Hf61M2y+wYpnELGG--