Comments regarding bsh2_2.0b2-1_powerpc.changes
Wolfgang Baer
WBaer@gmx.de
Tue May 17 07:11:03 2005
Hi all,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Sun, 15 May 2005 17:04:53 -0400,
> Joerg Jaspert <ftpmaster@debian.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Maintainer,
>
>
> Hi Joerg, Hi all,
>
>
>>why is this packaged as a seperate bsh2 package?
>>Why not just as a new upstream version of bsh?
>
>
> We had a discussion about this but I can't find it in the
> archives... There was a compatibility problem. bsh1 (aka bsh) is the
> stable release and bsh2 is still beta but widely used and needed for
> another package.
>
> Maybe Wolfgang rememeber our discussion.
Well, there are several api removals. However I am not sure if they
were used by external projects using bsh at all.
Currently, three packages require beanshell either as runtime or
build-depends: jmeter, jdee (debian name jde ??) and libjfreereport-java
According to upstream changelog for jdee they switched in a newer
upstream version to bsh2.0 so there should be no problem at all, if
the packages gets updated.
Current jfreereport-java comes with the old bsh in the download and
jmeter doesn't state anything on its pages or in the downloads.
From a quick test:
libjfreereport-java and jmeter at least compile against beanshell 2.0.
>
> Wolfgang, can we replace package bsh2 as bsh? Maybe upload it to
> experimental?
Well I think so - I will prepare a new upload.
@ftpmasters - please remove bsh2 from new queue
and sorry for the noise !
Wolfgang