Bug#308913: my mistake : (

[ms419@freezone.co.uk, 308913@bugs.debian.org]

> No - it was not fixed with gjdoc 0.74 - it was fixed two days after
> the release so atm only in cvs. BTW, if you have a look at gjdoc bugs,
> you can see that the bug is not yet closed!

Oops - my mistake - I was sure that Sable & gjdoc 0.7.4-1 successfully 
built Lucene javadocs, while Kaffe failed - so I assumed that Kaffe 
must use an older version of gjdoc than 
/usr/share/java/gnu-classpath-tools-gjdoc.jar

However, on double checking I discover that both Kaffe & Sable succeed 
with /usr/share/java/gnu-classpath-tools-gjdoc.jar built from cvs, 
while both fail with gjdoc 0.7.4-1

Sorry - please excuse my mistake!

> Given the information above - this seems to be the same bug as 306371
> of gjdoc. Do you agree? If yes I will reassign this bug to gjdoc and
> merge it with the other one.

This is reasonable - thanks!

Again - my apologies for taking up your time : (

Jack