Bug#544546: reassign 544546 to fop, retitle 544546 to should provide libfop-java

[Michael Koch]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 06:06:41PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> reassign 544546 fop 
> retitle 544546 should provide libfop-java

Why? There is no real need to for this. Any packages can depend on fop
and be done. The reason why it was called fop and not libfop-java was that
it is not only a library but also a program.

Please rethink your bug report.


Cheers,
Michael