Bug#545802: libjgrapht0.6-java-link: Unusual name for a default package

[Torsten Werner]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Guillem Jover<guillem at debian.org> wrote:
> This package has a non-conventional name for a default package, the
> -link postfix is a bit confusing. Could you rename it to libjgrapht-java
> instead? Or is there a problem with using that one?

yes, both such packages are just bloat. Why not moving the unversioned
symlink and the unversioned Provides field to the versioned
libjgrapht0.6-java package?

BTW, who files the removal request against the now obsolete
libjgrapht-java source package?

Cheers,
Torsten