Bug#601685: libbsf-java: package does not support optional libs (as the description claims)

[Ximin Luo]

severity 601685 important

On 29/10/10 06:17, tony mancill wrote:
> I've applied the patch and committed the update to the packaging repo.

cool, thanks :)

> I'm not sure I agree with the severity - the current package isn't completely
> unusable, is it?  (Your bug report says "mostly useless.")  Would severity
> important be more appropriate?

oh, I picked that based on the fact that only 1/5 of the options are supported.
after playing around with the package, i've found that this issue currently
only affects js on java 5, so I guess "important" is better.

(the other three libs are not supported by debian anyway, and js/bsf is
included with java 6.)

X

-- 
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE