Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11

Thu Dec 8 13:47:00 UTC 2011

Hi,

On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?

I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes 
(revision 1211788).

Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing list.

-- 
Vincent Hobeïka
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20111208/8231eada/attachment.pgp>