Bug#649476: fop: Failure confirmed with 1:1.0.dfsg2-3 but not with 1:0.95.dfsg-11
mathieu.malaterre at gmail.com
Mon Jan 2 10:41:01 UTC 2012
2011/12/8 Vincent Hobeïka <vincent.hobeika at cosmo-platform.org>:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?
> I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes
> (revision 1211788).
> Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing list.
fop 0.95 and 1.0 from debian do not always behave stricly as fop
downloaded from apache.org website since fop comes with its own
convenient copies of 3rd party libs.
I'll try to reduce test case.
More information about the pkg-java-maintainers