Bug#698974: umlet dependency on libjsyntaxpane-java

[Martin Quinson]

For the reccord, the packaging work is done in the package git. If
someone could test it (with git-buildpackage), I will upload it.

Thanks, Mt.

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> from my Point of view, there is nothing speaking against a new version
> of jsyntaxpane. As far as I understand it, umlet does not need to be
> recompiled and will work better with the new version, so please go
> ahead.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Benjamin
> 
> On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 23:00 +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
> > hello Benjamin,
> > 
> > I am working on the freeplane package which depends on
> > libjsyntaxpane-java like your package umlet (and I think those two
> > packages are the only ones which depend on libjsyntaxpane-java in
> > testing). But freeplane needs a more recent version (r156 vs r148), so I
> > looked at building umlet with jsyntaxpane-0.95~r156:
> > 
> > - With the default unstable package (11.3-5, built from source on
> >   testing) I do not get colors and italics in the bottom right pane.
> > 
> > - If I symlink /usr/share/java/jsyntaxpane.jar to
> >   jsyntaxpane-0.9.5~r156.jar [1], and restart umlet, then I get colors and
> >   italics in the editor pane.
> > 
> > So it looks like it would be a good idea to use the new jsyntaxpane for
> > both umlet and freeplane.
> > 
> > (I posted here: 
> > http://code.google.com/p/umlet/issues/detail?id=120&q=label%3AType-Defect&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20UMLet%20Owner%20Summary
> > but that is no longer relevant because it's a debian issue)
> > 
> > [1] built from the latest http://jsyntaxpane.googlecode.com/svn/branches/r095/
> > using:
> > $ <change RELEASE to a version number in pom.xml>
> > $ mvn package
> > (I can send you the file for testing if that is easier for you)
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> 

-- 
Je crois que nous sommes dans une tendance irréversible pour plus de
liberté et de démocratie, mais ça pourrait changer.
  -- G.W. Bush