Orphaned bugs filed against tomcat5.5 (and related packages)
Andrei POPESCU
andreimpopescu at gmail.com
Sat May 25 15:01:16 UTC 2013
On Sb, 18 mai 13, 11:47:39, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> Because these are quite old they should probably just be closed with a
> text like "if you can reproduce this with the version in wheezy please
> file a new bug". I plan to do so unless you object (or I don't hear from
> you in a few days).
I just did this.
> Among the bugs in question there are also bugs #495235 and #505709
> tagged patch. Normally I would reassign those before mass-closing, to
> not loose potentially useful patches, but I don't know to which version
> (6 or 7). It would be great if you could look at them yourself and deal
> with them as you see fit.
I closed those a few days ago, after checking myself whether they
contain something of value.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20130525/40b0418d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pkg-java-maintainers
mailing list