Orphaned bugs filed against tomcat5.5 (and related packages)

Andrei POPESCU andreimpopescu at gmail.com
Sat May 25 15:01:16 UTC 2013


On Sb, 18 mai 13, 11:47:39, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> 
> Because these are quite old they should probably just be closed with a 
> text like "if you can reproduce this with the version in wheezy please 
> file a new bug". I plan to do so unless you object (or I don't hear from 
> you in a few days).

I just did this.
 
> Among the bugs in question there are also bugs #495235 and #505709
> tagged patch. Normally I would reassign those before mass-closing, to 
> not loose potentially useful patches, but I don't know to which version 
> (6 or 7). It would be great if you could look at them yourself and deal 
> with them as you see fit.

I closed those a few days ago, after checking myself whether they 
contain something of value.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20130525/40b0418d/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list