Bug#687694: Close?

[gregor herrmann]

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 08:31:45 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:

> > The former, i.e. "<< X"; it should break everything less than the first
> > fixed version of those packages, since there are broken (pun
> > intended).
> 
> Actually, (being a bit pedantic) you should use "<< X~", so backports
> cannot satisfy the relation either.  In this given case, I don't think
> it will make a difference, but I believe it is a good habit to have.

Ack, thanks for adding this detail!

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Aimee Mann: Video
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20130908/189a340f/attachment.sig>