Bug#734279: jblas: FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled at build time
Roland Stigge
stigge at antcom.de
Thu Jan 9 08:24:51 UTC 2014
On 01/09/2014 07:56 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>> Why should it be less useful than on other architectures? We
>> shouldn't differenciate between architectures in this regard,
>> IMO.
>
> Sorry, imprecise wording on my part. What I meant was, I wonder if
> the package has ever been *usable* on architectures other than
> i386/amd64. It compiled, to be sure, but even the simplest upstream
> unit-test isn't able to execute on non-i386/amd64.
If this is the case, limiting supported architectures would be the
best solution, IMO. To save porters from headaches.
Roland
More information about the pkg-java-maintainers
mailing list