Bug#802671: Tentative patches for version 1.44

Markus Koschany apo at gambaru.de
Fri Dec 4 18:32:16 UTC 2015


On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:58:14 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <hertzog at debian.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I have asked an upstream developer (Peter Dettman) to review it.
> > 
> > He reviewed them and came up with further suggestions. So there's a third
> > patch (attached) to apply on top of the two patches that I already
> > submitted. I sent him the third patch for review too.
> 
> Tha patch is also OK according to Peter. However he asked me to not
> yet release the update as further improvements in public key/point
> validation are being made.
> 
> I'll the bug in the loop when I have more details, in the next few days in
> theory.

Hello Raphael,

thanks for your work on this bug. We intend to upload version 1.51 of
bouncycastle to unstable this weekend since we were able to upgrade all
reverse-dependencies except one so far. Are there any new information
regarding the patches for Jessie? Shall we still wait with an upload or
is it safe to use the three existing patches?

Regards,

Markus

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-java-maintainers/attachments/20151204/d5db429f/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-java-maintainers mailing list